Ne CONFIDENTIAL.
O
382
REC
25197
REG2 10 JUL 14
GOVERNMENT HOUSE.
HONGKONG. 16th. June, 1914.
70.
124
sir,
23
With reference to your Confidential Despatch of
the 15th. April covering correspondence on the proposed enactment ir
China of legislation similar to the Hongkong Ordinance llo. 5 of
1891, I have the honour to report that enquiries made of the local BT Commercial Community do not bear out the objections raised by the 1087
Board of Trade in their letter of the 23rd. of March. From these
enquiries it appears that when the seller lives in London or else-
-where at a distance the numbers of the shares are in practice not
inserted in the contract. The effect of the Hongkong Ordinance is te
make brokers refrain from entering into such contracts with clients
of doubtful stability, but it does not prevent a free market in
shares. There is in fact a considerable business in buying and sell-
-ing of shares between Hongkong and London.
In practice it has not been found that the
Ordinance has conduced to the undue inflation of the prices of
shares and their subsequent unloading on the public. No law will prevent people from being induced to buy shares at inflated prices, but the existing law is a check on their buying beyond their means.
ER
I have the honour to be,
Sir,
Your most obedient, humble servant,
may
Governor,&c..
HE RIGHT HONOURABLE
LEWIS HARCOURT, M.P.,
&C..
LC •
&c...
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.